<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Talk About Sex . . . Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/</link>
	<description>Website for author Nicole Peeler</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:57:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2470</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 04:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicolepeeler.com/?p=1385#comment-2470</guid>
		<description>Dear Nicole,
I just read Tempest Rising in 4 days- it rocked!  I stole your book from my husband who was reading it at the time.  Sorry Babe- I did not put that in the vows!  I love your comments tying Jane to comon experiences like Star Trek and Converse.  I could go on and on about your writing... but about the sex.  I love that your writing about sex leaves just enough detail to the imagination.  If I&#039;m reading along and I stumble across a &#039;Purple helmited love warrior&#039; or something else obscenely hysterical it just pulls me right out of the moment. You have no cutesy or wierd nicknames for any body parts which is just plain nice.  I also like the sensual build of the moment- describing the fabrics and clothes in a way that gives sensory details without describing too much, like a detective novel.  I agree about the lust thing.  Many characers are pulled into relationships too quickly to be believable.  Here&#039;s to a good &#039;Just Cuz&#039; scromping!  I hope to comment more in praise of Jane True later, but for now- keep up the great work! Thanks for a great read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Nicole,<br />
I just read Tempest Rising in 4 days- it rocked!  I stole your book from my husband who was reading it at the time.  Sorry Babe- I did not put that in the vows!  I love your comments tying Jane to comon experiences like Star Trek and Converse.  I could go on and on about your writing&#8230; but about the sex.  I love that your writing about sex leaves just enough detail to the imagination.  If I&#8217;m reading along and I stumble across a &#8216;Purple helmited love warrior&#8217; or something else obscenely hysterical it just pulls me right out of the moment. You have no cutesy or wierd nicknames for any body parts which is just plain nice.  I also like the sensual build of the moment- describing the fabrics and clothes in a way that gives sensory details without describing too much, like a detective novel.  I agree about the lust thing.  Many characers are pulled into relationships too quickly to be believable.  Here&#8217;s to a good &#8216;Just Cuz&#8217; scromping!  I hope to comment more in praise of Jane True later, but for now- keep up the great work! Thanks for a great read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Peeler</title>
		<link>http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2466</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Peeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 22:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicolepeeler.com/?p=1385#comment-2466</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Joyce! And I agree! I&#039;m so tired of characters having to be in love to have sex. So much pressure! LOL What happened to good, old fashioned lust?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Joyce! And I agree! I&#8217;m so tired of characters having to be in love to have sex. So much pressure! LOL What happened to good, old fashioned lust?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NicolePeeler</title>
		<link>http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2464</link>
		<dc:creator>NicolePeeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicolepeeler.com/?p=1385#comment-2464</guid>
		<description>[New Post] Let&#039;s Talk About Sex . . . Again - via @twitoaster http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[New Post] Let&#8217;s Talk About Sex . . . Again &#8211; via @twitoaster <a href="http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets.." rel="nofollow">http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.nicolepeeler.com/2010/01/lets-talk-about-sex-again/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nicolepeeler.com/?p=1385#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>I think that is one of the many reasons why I&#039;m enjoying Jane&#039;s adventure. I like a little bit of sex in a book, but I don&#039;t want a lot of  romance. I&#039;ve been turned off by several UF novels because there was too much romance. I think you include just the right amount of sex and I&#039;m really enjoying your work. 

Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that is one of the many reasons why I&#8217;m enjoying Jane&#8217;s adventure. I like a little bit of sex in a book, but I don&#8217;t want a lot of  romance. I&#8217;ve been turned off by several UF novels because there was too much romance. I think you include just the right amount of sex and I&#8217;m really enjoying your work. </p>
<p>Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

